Old Pyro
Registered: December 2004
Posts: 54
|
|
Review Date: February 1, 2005
|
Would you recommend the product? No |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 2
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
Nice green
|
|
Cons:
|
Low power and very short lived
|
|
Height:
|
|
|
Intensity:
|
|
|
Crowd Pleaser?:
|
|
|
Bang For The Buck?:
|
|
|
They spin, they're green and they lift into the air. These things struggle to get 20 feet in the air so don't believe the reports of 90 feet. I have shot twelve of these and they consistently sucked. It is only this consistency that rates them a 2 (that and the fact that I get nose cones for my BP rockets). Don't waste your money.
|
|
tmetz
Registered: April 2006
Posts: 1
|
|
Review Date: May 17, 2006
|
Would you recommend the product? No |
Price you paid?: $4.00
| Rating: 3
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
Consistant and well stabilized for a wingless product
|
|
Cons:
|
Very dangerous on return
|
|
Height:
|
|
|
Intensity:
|
|
|
Crowd Pleaser?:
|
|
|
Bang For The Buck?:
|
|
|
I have to disagree with the prior review. My batch easily hits 75 feet or more. The problem with them is that they are built like a brick #@!%house. The plastic nose cones are very thick and pointed, and the bodies are very heavy when empty. On re-entry they fall very hard, maybe hard enough to dent a car. They need to be used in a very open and empty area.
|
|
closer1138
Registered: May 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 5
|
|
Review Date: May 19, 2006
|
Would you recommend the product? No |
Price you paid?: $5.00
| Rating: 3
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
Good height and great sound....bright colors during flight.
|
|
Cons:
|
Dangerous fallout.
|
|
Height:
|
|
|
Intensity:
|
|
|
Crowd Pleaser?:
|
|
|
Bang For The Buck?:
|
|
|
They just fly up in the air. Wish they had a payload or report or something. Heads up with the fallout!
|
|
nickcatanzariti
Registered: May 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 34
|
|
Review Date: May 20, 2006
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
great height
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
Height:
|
|
|
Intensity:
|
|
|
Crowd Pleaser?:
|
|
|
Bang For The Buck?:
|
|
|
I disagree with the previous reviews. This is a great filler for during the day or waiting until the shows on. It gets great height and looks great at night. They are heavy though and probably will do damage if they hit anything.
|
|
Pyrofreedom.com
Registered: October 2005
|
|
Review Date: April 16, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? No |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 3
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
None
|
|
Cons:
|
Expensive, Poor Performance, Dangerous When Coming DOwn
|
|
Height:
|
25 To 50 Feet
|
|
Intensity:
|
Quiet
|
|
Crowd Pleaser?:
|
No
|
|
Bang For The Buck?:
|
No
|
|
Why buy these when you can buy something like Phantom's Jumbo Jumping Jacks? These things are way too expensive, get poor height, and can really do some damage coming down. Jumbo Jumping Jacks, Buzz Balls, Flying Ground Blooms, and every other rewrap of that item performs 10 times better and in a smaller, safer package.
|
|
ttam23
Registered: March 2007
Posts: 10
|
|
Review Date: May 18, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? No |
Price you paid?: $8.00
| Rating: 1
|
|
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
|
none
|
|
Cons:
|
pore flight no repots
|
|
Height:
|
25 To 50 Feet
|
|
Intensity:
|
Quiet
|
|
Crowd Pleaser?:
|
No
|
|
Bang For The Buck?:
|
No
|
|
very poor i would ever buy then again
|
|
Registered: July 2004
Location: WV Eastern Panhadle